Sponsored
White House unveils cybersecurity plan (AP) : Technet |
- White House unveils cybersecurity plan (AP)
- LimeWire, major record labels settle for $105M (AP)
- Video: An overview of Android for tablets, Honeycomb 3.0 (Yahoo! News)
- Viddy makes creating and sharing short video clips easy (Yahoo! News)
- Tetris Rendered Sweeter With Gummi Bears [VIDEO] (Mashable)
- AOL offers video chat with no log-in, download (AP)
- Report: Google ad inquiry focused on pharmacies (AP)
- Experts on PSN Hack: Sony Could Have Done More (PC World)
- First 7-Inch Android Honeycomb Tablet Expected from ViewSonic (PC World)
- WhoSay tames social networking for celebrities (AFP)
- Tablets Aren't Necessarily Cannibalizing Laptop Sales (PC World)
- Army of Darkness Defense tops iPhone Games of the Week (Appolicious)
- AT&T sets $6 bil breakup fee (Investor's Business Daily)
- 'Rogue websites' bill returns to US Senate (AFP)
- Why Googleâs Chromebooks are born to lose (Digital Trends)
- Adobe Flash Update Puts Users in Charge of Privacy (PC World)
- Microsoft Shaking up CRM Release Cycle (PC World)
White House unveils cybersecurity plan (AP) Posted: 12 May 2011 03:46 PM PDT WASHINGTON – Companies that run critical U.S. industries such as power plants would get government incentives to make sure their systems are secure from computer-based attacks, the White House said Thursday, detailing its broad proposal to beef up the country's cybersecurity. The approach is similar to congressional legislation already in the works, but some criticized it as being too weak Thursday, while the business community said it preferred a voluntary program rather than government mandates. Under its proposed legislation, the White House would give the Department of Homeland Security the authority to work with industry to come up with ways to secure their computer systems and protect against cyber threats. If a company fails to do so, or comes up with an inadequate plan, DHS would be able develop its own security framework for that firm. The proposals reflects the broad understanding that any more stringent regulatory system — such as the one that controls safety at nuclear power plants — would get little support, and business groups have been lobbying strongly for as much of a voluntary program as possible. The government should encourage the private sector to voluntarily adopt security standards, and "avoid a one-size-fits-all, mandated approach to cybersecurity," said Phil Bond, president of TechAmerica, which represents about 1,200 companies. But critics say the White House approach has little teeth. "The Administration's proposal shows no sense of urgency," said Stewart Baker, a former senior Homeland Security official. "It tells even critical industries on which our lives and society depend that they will have years before anyone from government begins to evaluate their security measures." Under the administration's proposal, an independent group would evaluate the security plans. And the DHS could use that evaluation as it makes purchasing decisions, thus potentially rewarding companies who take strong measures to secure their networks from intrusions. The threat is diverse, ranging from computer hackers going after banking and financial accounts to terrorists or other nations breaching government networks to steal sensitive data or sabotage critical systems like the electrical grid, nuclear plants or Wall Street. Federal computer networks are being scanned and attacked millions of times a day, and U.S. officials warn that hackers have begun targeting power plants and other critical operations to either bring them down or take them over. A glaring example was the Stuxnet worm that targeted Iran's nuclear program last year, including the infection of laptops at Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant. Several House and Senate committees have been working on cybersecurity legislation for the past two years, while waiting for the administration to weigh in with its proposal. The process has been difficult, as industry leaders, privacy advocates and security experts wrangled over how to protect the U.S. from cyberattacks without infringing on business practices or civil liberties. Key lawmakers involved in drafting Senate and House versions of the cybersecurity bill praised the White House plan, while noting that Congress and the White House are sharply divided over at least one issue. House and Senate lawmakers want the White House cyber coordinator to be subject to Senate confirmation. The White House has opposed that idea. The White House proposal also requires companies to tell their customers when their personal information has been compromised. The disclosure requirement is part of a push for greater openness by companies who are often reluctant to reveal they have been hacked. Sen. Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., in a related move Thursday, pushed the Securities and Exchange Commission to clarify that companies should disclose information about cybersecurity lapses. In a letter to the SEC, he said a 2009 survey suggested that nearly 40 percent of Fortune 500 companies don't reveal privacy or data breaches. Such information, he said in the letter signed by four other Democratic senators, would be valuable for investors, analysts and credit rating agencies. Rockefeller, who is chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, is working with his panel and leaders of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, to finish draft cybersecurity legislation. The effort is being coordinated by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. The administration plan also lays out guidelines for federal agencies to continuously monitor and protect their systems, insisting that they have a better understanding of who is on their networks, what they are doing and whether any data is being stolen or manipulated. Officials said Thursday that the proposal calls for strong protections for individuals' privacy and civil liberties. And it also sets out expanded criminal penalties for cyber crimes. |
LimeWire, major record labels settle for $105M (AP) Posted: 12 May 2011 05:08 PM PDT SAN FRANCISCO – File-sharing software company LimeWire, which shut down last year after being barred from allowing people to share copyright-protected files online, reached a $105 million out-of-court settlement with the major record labels Thursday, the labels said. In a statement, Recording Industry Association of America Chairman Mitch Bainwol said his group, which represents the labels, is pleased with the settlement. "The resolution of this case is another milestone in the continuing evolution of online music to a legitimate marketplace that appropriately rewards creators," he later added. LimeWire, which had enabled people to share songs and other files over the Internet, had been fighting the RIAA for several years. The RIAA argued LimeWire's software encouraged illegal sharing of copyrighted music. Last May LimeWire was found liable of copyright infringement, with a trial to follow early this year. That trial started last week. In October, LimeWire received a federal injunction forcing it to disable key functions of its software. At that time, the company said it would continue developing a new service that would include a desktop player, mobile apps and a catalog of music from which people could legally stream and download songs. But in December, Lime Group said it would shut down LimeWire completely due to its legal situation. |
Video: An overview of Android for tablets, Honeycomb 3.0 (Yahoo! News) Posted: 12 May 2011 06:18 PM PDT
If you're in the market for a tablet and not sure which is right for you, check out what to expect from an Android tablet in our Honeycomb overview above. Be sure to also consult our visual guide to the top tablets of 2011 as well. and as always, if you have any requests for something you'd like Just Show Me to cover, please let us know in the comments! More from Tecca: |
Viddy makes creating and sharing short video clips easy (Yahoo! News) Posted: 12 May 2011 02:45 PM PDT If you're a fan of iPhone camera apps like Instagram and picplz that allow you to easily add fun effects to your photos and share them, you'll be instantly familiar with the concept of new app Viddy. What the former two services are for images, Viddy is for video clips. The app gives you an easy way to edit the videos on your phone by applying visual filters — or as Viddy calls them, Production Packs — that enhance your footage with film-like special effects and a soundtrack. Once you've chosen a 15 second section of a video and applied a production pack you like, you can easily share that video out to your followers on Viddy as well as to your Facebook wall and Twitter stream. We had a chance to meet with Viddy's two founders, Brett O'Brien and JJ Aguhob, for a demo of the app and a sneak peak at what's on deck for the young Venice, CA-based startup. The pair say they've had success making their app easy enough to use for a wide range of demographics, from 7-year-olds to 80-year-olds, which is by no means an easy feat considering how complex the traditional activity of video editing tends to be. Editing video on your mobile phone is an even greater challenge, but the Viddy app fulfills the design mantra of "Keep It Simple, Stupid" admirably. Once you've downloaded the free app, you can create new videos by recording inside the app or selecting from your existing photo library. You're limited to a short 15-second clip, which the founders say keeps Viddy's focus on quick, bite-sized video snacks that are addictive to consume — they told us the average session time spent browsing video in the app is an extremely high 55 minutes. "We're kind of like a party," says Aguhob, speaking to how active and participatory the fledgling Viddy community has already become. The 15 second limit also dovetails well with a general internet sharing trend away from longer-form blog posts and towards shorter status updates on social networks like Facebook and Twitter. Nevertheless, that length constraint is one of the things users tend to complain about the most, and the founders say they're not committed to setting it in stone. The editing tools are extremely simple to use. After recording or selecting your video, you can use a simple scrub window to pick out which 15 second segment of the total video to use. Then you can apply a number of preset effects or production packs with one click, and audition what each effect will look like after a short rendering process. During the video preview, two sliders at the bottom of the screen control how much of the effect is applied (up to 100%), and how much you'll hear the effect soundtrack versus the original audio from the video; keeping the slider tuned to the center point gives you half and half of each audio track. Once you're satisified with your new video creation, you can easily share it to your Facebook and Twitter friends and your Youtube channel by entering your account credentials. Your status update or tweet includes a link to your video, which your friends can watch on the Viddy website. Plus, your Viddy friends will be able to watch your new video inside the app under the Feed section. In the Feed, which you select at the lower left of the main app navigation, you have three different ways to browse videos: "Following" shows you videos from friends you've followed on Viddy, "Popular" shows you the most popular videos over the past day, and "Trending" shows you the hottest videos from the last hour. The founders told us the popularity algorithm weighs how many views, likes, and comments each video has to serve up the most interest stuff to you at any given time. Any video you "Like" is also saved to your Favorites collection so you can revisit your video finds again later. After a couple of short weeks in the Apple App Store, Viddy is already seeing runaway success with over 200,000 downloads. Considering the universal appeal of video sharing, it's not surprising that a healthy chunk of the userbase is international. It seems like the perfect storm for an app like Viddy to hit the market, with the death of the Flip handheld video recorder in its wake and the rise of tools like iMovie for iPhone bringing mobile phone video editing to the mainstream. While mobile video has been around for several years already, the tools for easily editing and sharing those videos to your social graph have been slower to emerge. It's been relatively easy to whip out your phone and shoot some video, but "the issue is making something worth sharing," says O'Brien. Viddy helps solve that problem by allowing people to "beautify and create" something more compelling than the raw 10 minute clip users otherwise often have sitting around on their phones. What's next for Viddy? Look for an Android app and a native iPad experience next, along with an API so third parties can access data from the app including user feeds, profile information, and trending/popular videos. Foursquare integration is also on deck, as well as support for sharing to Tumblr and Posterous. Also expect a number of new Production Packs within the next few weeks, some of which we had a chance to preview and were definitely impressed with. Eventually, the business model most likely involves in-app sales of premium Production Packs, including celebrity-sponsored effects along with movie and music-themed filters. Cloud storage and longer videos are also revenue possibilities on the table, but the founders say they want to avoid using an advertising model if possible. Ads would clutter up the interface, and Viddy wants to "keep it simple," according to Aguhob. Other new features to look forward to include being able to choose a soundtrack independently from a visual effect, whereas Production Packs have dedicated audio attached currently. You'll also be able to directly share videos from the Feed to Facebook and Twitter, tag Facebook friends in your videos, search and surf video tags, enjoy higher quality bitrate playback, and more discovery tools for finding videos and other users you might like. Have you used Viddy? If so, what were your impressions of the app? Let us know in the comments! More from Tecca: |
Tetris Rendered Sweeter With Gummi Bears [VIDEO] (Mashable) Posted: 12 May 2011 02:52 PM PDT Each day, Mashable highlights one noteworthy YouTube video. Check out all our viral video picks. Finally, someone has gone ahead and mingled two things that tech nerds hold dear: video games and candy. Apparently, 10 pounds of gummi bears were used to create this film, which renders games like Tetris in 8 bits of sugar. [More from Mashable: Why Connected TV Is Poised To Revolutionize Entertainment] The director should totally collaborate with The Flaming Lips and their music-packed gummi skull on his next production. Image courtesy of Flickr, washingtonydc This story originally published on Mashable here. |
AOL offers video chat with no log-in, download (AP) Posted: 12 May 2011 07:23 PM PDT PALO ALTO, Calif. – In a move to become more competitive in the fast-growing field of video chat, the team behind AOL Inc.'s AIM instant messenger rolled out the first version of a free video chat service on Thursday that doesn't require users to log in or download any software. Called AV, the service was created as a way to have quick, easy video chats, Jason Shellen, a leader of the AIM team, said. Though there are plenty of other voice and video chat offerings available for computers and smartphones, AV is unlike many with its decision to eschew both logins and software downloads. In order to start a chat, a user gets a unique link from AV and sends it to friends. Once a friend with a webcam clicks on the link, a chat window will pop up on the screen and show live video of the user who started the chat session and any other participants. Up to four people can be involved in a chat at once, Shellen said. The service has several features, such as the ability to type messages to individual users while video chatting — to send a link to a webpage, for example. The originator of the chat session also has the ability to remove others from that chat. Other features will arrive in the next few weeks, Shellen said, including one called "Group Shot" that allows you to take a photo of everyone participating in the chat at once. AV, which is located at http://www.aim.com/av, uses Adobe Systems Inc.'s Flash software. This means it will not work on an iPad or iPhone, but it will work on a PC and may work on some Flash-running smartphones. Shellen said his team is starting to explore making it available for other platforms and as a mobile app. Initially, there is no plan for AOL make money from AV, Shellen said. AV's release comes two days after Microsoft Corp. said it would pay $8.5 billion for popular Internet phone service Skype, which allows people to make free and cheap voice and video calls. |
Report: Google ad inquiry focused on pharmacies (AP) Posted: 12 May 2011 07:10 PM PDT SAN FRANCISCO – Google Inc. recently set aside $500 million to cover a possible settlement of a U.S. government investigation into the Internet search leader's distribution of online ads from illegal pharmacies, according to a report published Thursday. The Wall Street Journal said the U.S. Attorney's office in Rhode Island and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have been leading the criminal probe into whether Google improperly profited from ads promoting drug sales by pharmacies or people without the proper licensing. The newspaper cited unnamed people familiar with the matter. Spokespeople from Google, the FDA and Peter Neronha, the U.S. Attorney in Rhode Island, all declined to comment Thursday. The Journal's article illuminates a mystery triggered earlier this week by a bombshell contained in Google's quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC documents included a vague reference to a Justice Department investigation into the usage of Google's automated system for placing ads alongside search results and other content at hundreds of thousands of websites. Google raised even more intrigue by subtracting $500 million from its first-quarter earnings to cover a potential settlement. Google co-founder Sergey Brin then dodged a reporter's question about the government investigation at a software developers' conference presented by the company in San Francisco. The evasiveness raised questions about how deeply the government might be digging into Google's ad network, a moneymaking machine that is expected to generate more than $30 billion in revenue this year. Regulators in Europe are already taking a broad look at how Google's ad system works as part of an antitrust investigation into whether the company's business practices are stifling competition. Although this U.S. probe appears to be focused on a narrower issue, it's still a touchy matter for Google. Besides sticking Google with a big bill, the inquiry could draw more attention to how vulnerable Google's automated system has been to the machinations of shady operators. Google acknowledged the problem in a federal lawsuit filed last fall against dozens of "rogue" online pharmacies that were finding ways to place ads for drugs despite the company's efforts to prevent the abuses. The individuals identified in the complaint were based in New York, Tennessee and Ohio. In one of the more common practices, the illicit drug dealers would plug subtle misspellings of drug names frequently entered into Google's search engine to generate ads alongside the results. For instance, one illegal drug advertiser spelled the anabolic steroid Dianabol as "Diano bol" in Google's automated system to produce an ad, according to the lawsuit in San Jose federal court. Google has obtained court orders banning some of the rogue pharmacies named in the lawsuit and is still seeking injunctions against the others. "Rogue pharmacies are bad for our users, for legitimate online pharmacies and for the entire e-commerce industry," Google lawyer Michael Zwibelman wrote in a company blog post on the same day the company filed its lawsuit in September. "So we are going to keep investing time and money to stop these kinds of harmful practices." The lawsuit came seven months after Google imposed new restrictions on the kinds of pharmaceutical ads it would accept in the U.S. and Canada. The new rules were supposed to only allows ads from U.S. pharmacies that had been accredited by a special program run by the National Association Boards of Pharmacy. In Canada, the accreditation had to come from the Canadian International Pharmacy Association. Google's critics have complained in the past that the company and other websites haven't been vigilant about policing pharmaceutical ads because they are so lucrative. Drug and health care advertising generated about $1 billion in Internet spending last year and is expected to grow to nearly $1.9 billion by 2015, according to the research firm eMarketer Inc. |
Experts on PSN Hack: Sony Could Have Done More (PC World) Posted: 12 May 2011 05:30 PM PDT As the PlayStation Network outage enters its fourth week, with no definite answer to the question of when service will be restored, security experts have told PCWorld that Sony could have done more to prevent PSN from being infiltrated by hackers. Their comments follow the congressional testimony of Gene Stafford, a computer security professor at Purdue University, who told lawmakers that Sony used an outdated version of the Apache Web server software, and had no firewall installed. Hackers compromised the PlayStation Network on April 19, stole personal data, and forced Sony to rebuild its network from the ground up--a process that is still going on. Sony has denied Stafford's claims, but other experts who spoke with PCWorld doubt that Sony took every precaution that it could have. "Everything I've seen suggests that this very, very much could have been prevented," said Stan Stahl, president of the Los Angeles chapter of the Information Systems Security Association, which organizes conferences for security experts. Stahl has no direct knowledge about the attack, but his experience suggests that Sony's security approach was outdated. He noted that Sony had blamed the PSN hack, in part, on an earlier denial-of-service attack, which had inadvertently or intentionally weakened the network's defenses against the larger break-in. Stahl knows this method quite well; he used a similar approach himself about eight years ago to crack a water company's Website as part of a consulting job. "If we can do that to a small water district using an attack that's seven or eight years old, and Sony got hit with that attack ...you've got to say somebody at Sony wasn't watching the store," Stahl said. Kris Alexander, head of gaming strategy for Akamai, said it's common for attacks to come in multiple waves, as they did for Sony. Alexander wouldn't talk about Sony specifically because Akamai's policy is not to comment on companies in the games industry, but he did say that it's important for companies to be prepared for attacks on more than one front. "Oftentimes, especially with malicious attackers, they're planning just as hard as you are to defend yourself," he said. After the Attack Mike Meikle, CEO of IT consulting firm Hawkthorne Group, was also critical of Sony, saying that the company's failings were evident in the way it responded to the breach. The company took five days to inform users that their names, e-mail addresses, passwords, real-world addresses, and birthdays were exposed; and only after the attacks did Sony announce that it would employ a chief information security officer to oversee the network. "They really didn't have a defined process to address data breaches," Meikle said. Many companies don't, he noted, because it's an extra expense, and data security hasn't been a hot-button issue until quite recently. Still, Meikle was disappointed with Sony's response. "Everyone was assuming that Sony, being Sony, would have their act together," he said, "and I think that's what's annoying people more than anything." Was the PSN Breach Inevitable? Although Sony's approach to security has come under fire, some experts--and some die-hard Sony fans--have painted the breach as unavoidable. Last week, renowned security expert Bruce Schneier told Kotaku that no network is truly secure, asserting that the fact that PSN was hacked likely had little to do with its level of security. "Everyone is probably equally sucky," he said. Gary Bahadur of KRAA Security refutes the idea that hacking is inevitable. "If you are diligent and have a rapid response process in place to identify all of your assets and test daily for vulnerabilities, you can maintain a very good security posture," he wrote in an e-mail message. The problem is that big targets like Sony need to invest considerable resources in stopping attacks, according to Steve Santorelli, director of outreach for Team Cymru, a nonprofit security research company in Chicago. "If you're a big enough target, you're going to have a lot of very talented people with a lot of resources and time hammering away at your systems," he said. Videogame networks will continue to be attractive targets for hackers, because all associated credit cards need to be kept active for subscriptions and downloadable content, according to Tim Keanini, chief technical officer for network security firm nCircle. "It's a good bet that other cybercriminals are looking at this breach and evaluating other gaming sites as potential targets because they are equally 'rich' in personal information that can be quickly converted to cold, hard cash," Keanini wrote in an e-mail message. Santorelli, who before his current job worked at Microsoft and as a detective sergeant on Scotland Yard's Computer Crime Unit, warned that there's no silver-bullet approach to stopping network breaches. He argued that there needs to be a sea change in the way consumers treat their data. "If there's one message post-Sony, it's that this is the reality these days, and you have a responsibility to protect yourself, your networks, your family, and your information, because no one else is going to do it for you," Santorelli said. He recommended practicing "good password hygiene" (specifically, not using the same password for every Website and service), keeping a close eye on banking statements, and maintaining a separate credit card for online purchases. For more information on dealing with PlayStation Network data theft in particular, check out our survival guide. Follow Jared on Facebook and Twitter for even more tech news and commentary. |
First 7-Inch Android Honeycomb Tablet Expected from ViewSonic (PC World) Posted: 12 May 2011 02:17 PM PDT Big screen Android tablets with Honeycomb 3.0 were all the rage, while smaller tablets were stuck with older smartphone versions of the OS--until now. The first 7-inch tablet featuring Honeycomb is set to arrive later this month from ViewSonic, and it will be dubbed the ViewPad 7x, according to a Pocket-Lint report. Because Google rushed Android 3.0 to the market to counter the popularity of the Apple iPad, the company was unable to optimize the OS for different-sized tablets fast enough. This meant that you could get Android 3.0 Honeycomb on 10-inch tablets such as the Motorola Xoom, but not on 7-inch tablets such as the HTC Flyer. Now it seems that ViewSonic will be the first to get on the market a 7-inch Honeycomb tablet at the end of May, if Pocket-Lint's sources are accurate. The tablet will be called the ViewPad 7x, and will reportedly be sold alongside the ViewPad 7 (not as a replacement). Pricing and exact availability are unknown for the ViewPad 7x. While the details on the ViewPad 7x are sketchy, we do know a bit more about the version without the X in the tail, which runs Android 2.2. It runs on a 600MHz processor and has 512MB of RAM and 512MB of on-board storage (expandable to 32GB via microSD card). The 7-inch screen has 800 by 480 pixel resolution, and the tablet also features 3G antennas along Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. Our PCWorld reviewer was not very impressed with the original ViewPad 7, citing a mediocre display, sluggishness, poor battery life, and bulky design as its main flaws. The original ViewPad 7 sells for around $400. Follow Daniel Ionescu and Today @ PCWorld on Twitter |
WhoSay tames social networking for celebrities (AFP) Posted: 12 May 2011 06:39 PM PDT SAN FRANCISCO (AFP) – Startup WhoSay has been working quietly in the background helping Hollywood stars keep control of pictures and videos at social networking sensations Twitter and Facebook. The invitation-only service caters to celebrities whose mere choice of shoes can spark fashion trends or casual meals out could turn unknown restaurants into hip dining spots. WhoSay's goal is to let famous folks use Twitter or Facebook to share private moments with fans without having posts such as digital photos used to endorse products or promote Web pages without permission. "We have a very simple objective and we work with a specific subset of the world: celebrity influence," WhoSay chief executive Steve Ellis told AFP. WhoSay provides software applications that its clients can put on their smartphones so that photos or videos fired off for Twitter or Facebook posts don't escape into the wild of the Internet. Third-party applications such as TwitPic and Plixi that are commonly used to host pictures Twitter users post in the form of links connected to written comments. Those applications claim rights to uploaded images. For celebrities using Twitter that means a candid photo sent out in a "tweet" could end up being used to promote sales of something they happened to be wearing or lure traffic to websites packed with money-making ads. Image-handling intermediaries have sold tweeted pictures, with customers reported to include paparazzi. "There are a lot of people profiting off of celebrities on the Internet in terms of Twitter," said Ann Gurrola, a Marleah Leslie & Associates publicist whose clients include celebrities and high-profile executives. "They are making all this money and your client is getting nothing," she continued. "With WhoSay, you get control." The roster of WhoSay users reportedly includes Kevin Spacey, Jim Carrey, John Cusack, Eva Longoria, and Enrique Iglesias. WhoSay provides clients with smartphone applications that host images or videos for Twitter or Facebook posts as copyrighted material on secure computers where fans can enjoy them. WhoSay is designed to keep publicists in tune with what celebrities are posting to Twitter or Facebook and even let assistants tend to accounts. "We think that them being connected to fans is important, but we want to give them the control they should have over their content," Ellis said. "They could share an image from their phone, but in a way that mattered to them." Similar safeguards are provided for home or work computers celebrities might use for Twitter or Facebook. Two of Gurrola's clients use WhoSay and she hopes to get more of them signed on to the service. "There is no down side; there is only an upside," Gurrola said of WhoSay. "I think what they are doing is brilliant." Impetus for WhoSay came from Creative Artists Agency (CAA), a Los Angeles-based publicist firm representing Hollywood stars including Brad Pitt, Oprah Winfrey, George Clooney, Sandra Bullock, Will Smith and Steven Spielberg. CAA has a minority stake in WhoSay, which listed athletes, actors, and musicians among its hundreds of clients. Online retail titan Amazon was listed as an investor in the startup. The small WhoSay team is divided between Los Angeles, New York, and London, according to Ellis. "We are big fans of Facebook and Twitter," Ellis said. "The onus is not on policing," he continued. "The onus is on sharing in this new-fashioned way where our clients get the benefit of the traffic and connection to their fans." WhoSay does not charge for its service. The startup was optimistic that it might one day share money high-profile clients could make from heavily-visited pages hosted by WhoSay. "Our clients can provide a unique perspective on themselves and their work," Ellis said. "They can provide the perspective from inside the limo on the way to an event, and what they see through their eyes." |
Tablets Aren't Necessarily Cannibalizing Laptop Sales (PC World) Posted: 12 May 2011 04:45 PM PDT Earlier this week, my PCWorld colleague Tony Bradley brought you the news that tablets purchasers are abandoning their laptops in favor of their new devices, according to a study from Nielsen. Well, that may or may not be true, according to where you like to get your studies. A new study of iPad owners from the NPD Group says the rate at which tablets are cannibalizing notebook or netbook sales is declining. NPD's research into the usage habits of iPad owners comes up with the revelation that only 14 percent of early iPad owners have dropped their personal computer in favor of the new gadget. And that number is dropping, with just 12 percent of users who bought their tablet after the holiday season kicking their PC to the curb. NPD makes the argument that while PC sales are down, the biggest spot for computers is in the sub-$500 laptop field that stands to lose the most to tablets. Such machines grew by 21 percent over the last quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of this year. Meanwhile, sales of Windows consumer notebooks over $500 dropped by 25 percent. So, while NPD agrees that laptop sales are down, it suggests you shouldn't point the finger at the iPad. Instead, the research firms suggest that PC sales simply aren't succeeding in keeping pace with the halcyon days of computer refresh caused by the launch of Windows 7 and the emergence of the netbook as a powerful new category--two big factors that led to computer sales going through the roof. In fact, the researcher says that 75 percent of those who purchased a tablet did not plan to buy any new technology over that timeframe, suggesting that "iPad sales added billions of dollars to the industry's coffers after years of [average selling price] declines draining the market." It's hard to argue that the iPad probably does carry better margins than does the netbook--it is from Apple, after all. Other notes from the NPD study:
"In fact, 65 percent of those who are planning to buy a tablet say that other devices will no longer be required," the research firm wrote. They go on to note that e-book readers and smartphones are more frequently being ditched in favor of the tablet--but still, it's a dramatic contrast from the U.S. study. Perhaps Canadians' buying and usage habits really are that different. Or perhaps Mark Twain had it right all along. Robert Dutt is a veteran IT journalist and blogger. He covers the Canadian IT technology solution provider scene daily at ChannelBuzz.ca. You can also find him on Twitter. |
Army of Darkness Defense tops iPhone Games of the Week (Appolicious) Posted: 12 May 2011 01:05 PM PDT |
AT&T sets $6 bil breakup fee (Investor's Business Daily) Posted: 12 May 2011 03:14 PM PDT If the telecom giant's proposed $39 bil acquisition of T-Mobile USA doesn't go though, AT&T (NYSE:T - News) would pay T-Mobile parent company Deutsche Telekom $3 bil in cash, $2 bil worth of spectrum and a $1 bil roaming agreement, sources told Reuters. The breakup fee would be 15.4% of the buyout price, a global record high. The steep fee suggests AT&T is confident it can win regulatory approval. Shares rose 0.8% to 31.64. |
'Rogue websites' bill returns to US Senate (AFP) Posted: 12 May 2011 03:27 PM PDT WASHINGTON (AFP) – US senators re-introduced a bill Thursday that would give the US authorities more tools to crack down on websites selling pirated movies, television shows and music and counterfeit goods. "This legislation will protect the investment American companies make in developing brands and creating content and will protect the jobs associated with those investments," said Senator Patrick Leahy, a Democrat from Vermont. "The Protect IP Act targets the most egregious actors, and is an important first step to putting a stop to online piracy and sale of counterfeit goods," Leahy said in a statement. A similar bill, the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act, was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee by a 19-0 vote in November but never made it to the Senate floor. The new version of the bill designed to combat so-called "rogue websites" has been renamed the Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act, or Protect IP Act. It was introduced by Leahy and Republicans Orrin Hatch of Utah and Chuck Grassley of Iowa. "We are sending a strong message to those selling or distributing counterfeit goods online that the United States will strongly protect its intellectual property rights," Hatch said. "Fake pharmaceuticals threaten people's lives. Stolen movies, music, and other products put many out of work." Grassley said the legislation "will add another tool to the toolbox for going after these criminals and protecting the American public." The previous bill had come under fire from digital rights and free speech groups for paving the way for the authorities to shut down websites, including non-US websites, without due process. The Obama administration has come in for some criticism for shutting down dozens of websites in recent months as part of a crackdown known as "Operation in Our Sites." US authorities in November shut down 82 websites selling mostly Chinese-made counterfeit goods, including golf clubs, Walt Disney movies, handbags and other items. One opponent of the bill, the Electronic Frontier Foundation. said Thursday it was "no less dismayed by this most recent incarnation than we were with last year's draft." The EFF said the bill attempts to "inject a little due process into the mix," but it "falls far short of the mark given the potential implications of these actions for online speech." The Center for Democracy & Technology said it still has "serious reservations" about the bill although there were some improvements. "In particular, the new bill rightly narrows the definition of infringement websites to target true bad actors," it said. The bill was strongly condemned by Ed Black, president and chief executive of the Computer & Communications Industry Association. "The United States government should not be in the business of choosing what Internet content is acceptable and censoring that which it deems is not," Black said. "Meddling with Internet architecture to disappear sites and even hyperlinks to those sites is an Orwellian approach to law enforcement. "Technologically speaking shutting down parts of the Internet, even for a seemingly good reason, is still censorship -- no matter what new name you give it," Black said. |
Why Googleâs Chromebooks are born to lose (Digital Trends) Posted: 12 May 2011 04:07 PM PDT It is funny how often it generally takes for a new idea to stick in the market. We first started messing around with tablets in the early 90s. Now, nearly 20 years later, only one vendor has made a successful one: the Apple iPad. Google's new Chromebooks are essentially thin clients — lightweight computers dependent on servers (the cloud in this case) which have terminals as their distant ancestors. Sun and Oracle tried to bring the thin client concept to market 20 years ago and failed miserably. Their efforts continued on as products from Wyse and HP, but never became the PC alternatives Scott McNealy and Larry Ellison's envisioned them as. Still, as with tablets, the second time could be a charm. Google is hell bent on proving that ChromeOS can be what Larry and Scott hoped: a true replacement for the PC. In their favor, a lot of the negatives that nearly killed the initiative last time have disappeared. Working against them, Windows 7 is vastly superior, and the iPad already serves as a better PC alternative than ChromeOS can ever be. What we know of Windows 8 suggests it blends ChromeOS and iPad concepts into Windows. If Google misses its shot, Microsoft likely benefits. Let's explore this.
The birth and near death of thin clientsThere was a lot of hope in the Windows wannabe camp back in 1993, when Larry Ellison first talked about thin clients, and Sun later embraced the ideal to create the Sun Ray one. A few years later, I hosted a bunch of CIOs in Europe at a desktop conference, and their reaction kind of summed up the problem. In the meeting there were (and this was unusual) a group of Sun executives who were listening in. They were supposed to act like well-behaved kids — seen and not heard. Unfortunately, they evidently missed that memo and started dumping on Windows. At the time, Windows NT was in its infancy, and folks weren't that happy with how Windows 95 had turned out.To my surprise, the CIOs and IT folks in the room tore into the Sun execs, explaining in great detail why the Sun Ray 1 thin client was brain dead stupid. It was a lock-in product that forced them to buy from Sun for all future upgrades (they preferred pitting vendors against each other). It was horribly expensive to implement. It had severe problems running current PC code. The migration costs were massive. Basically, they told Sun to take a hike because they weren't about to trade some annoying problems for some catastrophic ones. The Sun execs looked like they had been hit by a bus. Larry got that thin clients had to be cheap, and understood that they would likely play best in places like schools, where the security features inherent in them (it was really hard to mess them up compared to PCs) would be valued. However, he picked what appeared to be a girlfriend to run the independent company. Showcasing why executives shouldn’t think with their little heads, the effort failed. Since then, we have seen some innovative alternatives from companies like Clear Cube, which did remote PCs, and full on thin clients from Wyse and HP, but these mostly went places where data entry was king, serving as replacements for terminals. PCs running Windows are so inexpensive and entrenched that thin clients just don't seem to have any traction. But, then again, no one has really made a major push in this space for years either. And while mobile is huge in the PC space, it is more of an afterthought in thin clients. At least until now.
ChromeOSBack in the 90s, we thought of ISDN as broadband and hadn't even really learned to spell Wi-Fi, let alone had a clue what 3G or 4G were. With 4G and current generation Wi-Fi, we have access to bandwidth that seemed impossible two decades ago, and netbooks showcased that we could actually build some interesting laptops for under $400. While they didn't run Windows very well, they sure could run a thin operating system, and the iPad demonstrated that a well-tuned OS running on reasonably priced hardware could do amazing things.So the potential is here to revisit thin clients successfully. There are, however some big issues. The first is that netbooks largely failed in market, demonstrating that people just didn't want to buy cheap crap. The iPad was successful largely because people didn't see it as a cheap, limited laptop without a keyboard, which it actually kind of is. They saw it as something different thanks to its slate form factor and touchscreen. Don't forget Steve Jobs himself introduced both the first and second generations of the iPad, and Apple wrapped it with a massive marketing campaign in order for folks to see the iPad as something magical rather than a crippled notebook. A lot of hard work went in to setting the proper perception. The Chromebook looks like a laptop, making it much harder for buyers to see it as anything else. As for marketing, to say that Google has no concept of executing a marketing campaign at Apple's level would be making a vast understatement. Google appears to have both an inadequate skill set and marketing budget. Add to this the distinct lack of success of Android Tablets, which should have been able to better draft in the iPad's success, and you start to get worried. Add one more fact, that the Chromebook will be released before the offline capability is available, and you have the potential for a Xoom-like problem (the Xoom was released without 4G or Flash support, its two biggest features, and failed).
Why Google's Chromebook sets the stage for Windows 8It isn't that Google's Chromebooks are not potentially compelling; they actually look kind of interesting. The problem is that the netbook, Android Tablet and particularly the Xoom experience showcase what not to do, yet Google appears to be repeating all of these mistakes with the Chromebook. I actually think the product has promise, but that the company needs to channel Apple to make the concept work. Chromebooks need to appear less like cheap crippled laptops and more like something, well, iPad-like.The technology is close to being where it needs it to be, but the Steve-Jobs-like marketing vision is missing. When you are trying for something disruptive like this, it is marketing, not engineering, that has to take the lead. Unfortunately, Google's historic marketing weakness will doom this product unless the company addresses it. However there is little doubt that the Chromebook will set the stage for something else that may truly capture our imagination. Ironically, Google's execution makes it likely that this future product will be Windows 8. The entrenched vendor, and that would be Microsoft, always has the home advantage, particularly when the challenger screws up. According to the book "In the Plex," Jobs mentored the Google founders, who then ripped off his iPhone ideas. Evidently, they didn't understand or stay long enough to get the lesson on marketing. That'll cost them. |
Adobe Flash Update Puts Users in Charge of Privacy (PC World) Posted: 12 May 2011 04:50 PM PDT Adobe has released an important update to its Flash Player software that fixes critical security flaws and gives users a better way of controlling whether they are being tracked on the Web. The Flash Player 10.3 update, released Thursday, lets users manage Flash cookies using their browser's privacy settings or through a new control panel. Flash cookies, also called "Local Stored Objects," have been a sore spot for Adobe users since 2009, when researchers showed they were being used extensively to track Web surfers. The problem is that Flash cookies historically have been hard to remove, unlike traditional cookies, and some sites have used them to track users who have wanted to block cookies. Cookies are small snippets of text, stored on the computer, that websites use to identify repeat visitors. "Users could manage the [Flash cookies] before, however, the experience was not exactly the most user-friendly," Adobe spokeswoman Wiebke Lips said via e-mail. The new Flash cookie management option will work with the Firefox and Internet Explorer browsers. In the future, it will also be available to Chrome and Safari users, according to Adobe. Although there are still plenty of privacy issues on the Web, Adobe's update is good news, said Seth Schoen, a senior staff technologist with the Electronic Frontier Foundation who has followed the Flash cookie problem. "I'm glad Adobe is addressing this in a comprehensive way," he said in an e-mail message. "It's a shame that it's taken such a long time, but it's good that it's finally happened." Web surfers can also manage their Flash cookies through a new control panel, designed to give users a single place where they can make sure that Flash Player isn't doing anything it shouldn't. "With Flash Player 10.3, we have created a new native control panel for Windows, Macintosh and Linux desktops that will allow end-users to manage all of the Flash Player settings, including camera, microphone and Local Shared Objects," Adobe spokesman Peleus Uhley wrote in a blog posting. The new Flash Player also includes a number of improvements designed to make it a better media player, along with security fixes for several critical bugs. Also new: Mac OS users will now get automatic software update notifications, just like their Windows counterparts. "In the past, Mac users often had trouble keeping up with Flash Player updates since the Mac OS and Flash Player ship schedules are not in sync," Uhley wrote in a blog post. "With this new feature, Flash Player will automatically check each week for new updates and notify the user when new updates are available." The security updates, which affect all Flash platforms, are important. Flash has been used in a lot of online attacks over the past few years, and with this latest set of patches, Adobe said it's fixed a previously unknown flaw that had been leveraged in online attacks. "There are reports of malware attempting to exploit one of the vulnerabilities, CVE-2011-0627, in the wild via a Flash (.swf) file embedded in a Microsoft Word (.doc) or Microsoft Excel (.xls) file delivered as an email attachment targeting the Windows platform," Adobe said in a note posted to its website. "However, to date, Adobe has not obtained a sample that successfully completes an attack." Robert McMillan covers computer security and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Follow Robert on Twitter at @bobmcmillan. Robert's e-mail address is robert_mcmillan@idg.com |
Microsoft Shaking up CRM Release Cycle (PC World) Posted: 12 May 2011 12:00 PM PDT Microsoft is planning to increase the pace of releases for its Dynamics CRM (customer relationship management) software, according to a new "statement of direction" document from the vendor. The move may signal pressure Microsoft is feeling from rivals such as Salesforce.com, which updates its software several times a year. "Traditionally, major CRM product versions have been delivered in 2-3 year development cycles over multiple milestones," Microsoft said in the document. When it launched an online version in 2008, the company "added a parallel track of shorter development cycles which delivered updates and enhancements to the service twice yearly." The online version shares a single codebase with the on-premises and partner-hosted version of Dynamics CRM. "Moving forward, new capabilities for Microsoft Dynamics CRM (both Online and On-premises) will be delivered approximately twice yearly with releases targeted for Spring (Q2) and Fall (Q4) of each calendar year," the document stated. Customers will also be able to implement optional features for all versions through the Dynamics Marketplace, it said. On-premises and partner-hosted users will receive both updates and upgrades. The first type will provide new features without the need for a full upgrade, while the latter "may deliver deeper functionality enhancements and improvements, may incorporate significant Microsoft platform innovations (e.g. the next releases of Windows Server and desktop, .NET Framework, SQL Server, Office), and will have their own Microsoft support lifecycle for mainstream and extended support." Those customers are scheduled to receive an update in the fourth quarter of this year and an upgrade in the second quarter of 2012, according to Microsoft. CRM Online users will also have two flavors of updates. "Automatic service updates are made available to all Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online customers with no additional action required by users or administrators," Microsoft said. "Scheduled service updates may offer deeper functionality enhancements and improvements, and customers will have up to one year to schedule when the new Service Update [is] made available to their users." An automatic update is set for the fourth quarter, and a scheduled one for the second quarter of 2012. The document also discusses Microsoft's development plans for CRM, which include support for multiple browsers through HTML5, "device-specific application experiences" and self-service BI (business intelligence) tools. Both Salesforce.com and Microsoft are eager to land more deals with the world's biggest companies. CRM software is seen as an easier sale for vendors than ERP (enterprise resource planning) applications, since the technical and operational footprint isn't as large and complex. In announcing an update to Dynamics CRM earlier this year, Microsoft emphasized the release's ability to scale up to 150,000 concurrent users in a single instance without a hit on performance. Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris's e-mail address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
You are subscribed to email updates from Yahoo Tech News To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment